Sabtu, 01 Januari 2011

Inggris Ikut Jatuhkan SOEKARNO

London, Minggu

Media massa Inggris secara sistematis telah dimanipulir oleh pihak intelijen,
sebagai bagian dari persekongkolan untuk mendongkel Presiden Soekarno. Stasiun
radio BBC, harian Observer dan kantor berita Reuters telah dimanfaatkan oleh
para agen rahasia yang bekerja untuk Deplu Inggris.

Hari Sabtu (15/4) malam, Denis Healey yang di era 1960-an itu menjadi Menteri
Perburuhan Inggris, mengakui, perang intelijen yang dilancarkan terhadap
Indonesia telah ke luar batas. Pada suatu ketika Pemerintah Inggris memproduksi
dokumen-dokumen palsu yang mengabarkan ada serdadu-serdadu Inggris yang tewas di
Indonesia.

Akibat informasi salah itu, Healey bahkan sampai-sampai ikut menahan jangan
sampai angkatan perang melancarkan aksi militer di Indonesia. "Saya tidak akan
membiarkan angkatan udara menjatuhkan bom, meskipun mereka sudah bernafsu
melakukannya," kata Healey.

Sebuah dokumen Deplu Inggris mengungkapkan bagaimana penipuan itu dilakukan
secara meluas dari London, dan bagaimana pers dunia ternyata dimanipulir oleh
intelijen Inggris.

Sebuah surat bersifat "rahasia dan pribadi" pernah dikirimkan dari ahli
propaganda Norman Reddaway kepada Dubes Inggris di Jakarta, Sir Andrew Gilchrist.
Isi surat merupakan rencana membohongi pers, seolah-olah perlu mendongkel
Soekarno karena dia akan menjadikan Indonesia sebagai negara komunis.

"Sebuah berita palsu beredar ke seluruh dunia. Informasi dari Gilchrist langsung
diberitakan kembali ke Indonesia melalui stasiun radio BBC," kata Reddaway.
Termasuk dalam berita palsu ini adalah bagaimana diberitakan ke seluruh dunia
bahwa komunis di Indonesia berencana akan membunuh habis penduduk Jakarta.

"Saya penasaran apakah ini pertama kalinya seorang duta besar bertindak semaunya
dan begitu cepat, untuk bangsanya sendiri," kata Reddaway, yang waktu itu
bekerja sebagai ahli untuk Departemen Riset Informasi (IRD), Deplu Inggris.

Berita palsu

Menurut sejumlah dokumen kabinet, sejumlah institusi Inggris-termasuk dinas
rahasia MI6-memberikan bantuan kepada kelompok-kelompok di Indonesia untuk
mendongkel Bung Karno. Salah satu dokumen berisi permintaan dari pemerintah
kepada Kepala MI6, Dick White, untuk menyiapkan rencana operasi-operasi rahasia
di Indonesia bulan Januari 1964.

Menurut David Easter, sejarawan dari London Scholl of Economics yang meneliti
soal ini, salah satu dokumen menyebut operasi rahasia itu mencakup juga bentuan
senjata untuk kelompok separatis di Aceh dan Sulawesi. (The Independent/bas)

The Independent [UK]

16 April 2000

How we lied to put a killer in power

Revealed: Healey admits role in British dirty tricks campaign to overthrow
Indonesia?s President Sukarno

By Paul Lashmar and James Oliver

The world?s press was systematically manipulated by British intelligence as part
of a plot to overthrow Indonesia?s President Sukarno in the 1960s, according to
Foreign Office documents. he BBC, the Observer and Reuters news agency were all
duped into carrying stories manufactured by agents working for the Foreign
Office.

Last night, Denis Healey, Labour?s defence secretary at the time, admitted the
intelligence war had spun out of control in Indonesia. At one point the British
were planting false documents on dead soldiers. Lord Healey even had to stop
service chiefs from taking military action. He said: "I would not let the RAF
drop a single bomb although they were very anxious to get involved."

The left-leaning Sukarno was overthrown in 1966 and up to half a million people
were massacred by the new regime. Now a Foreign Office document obtained by the
Independent on Sunday reveals the full extent of the "dirty tricks" campaign
orchestrated from London, and how the world?s journalists were manipulated.

A letter marked "secret and personal" from propaganda expert Norman Reddaway to
Britain?s Jakarta ambassador, Sir Andrew Gilchrist, brags about the campaign
which aimed to destabilise Mr Sukarno by suggesting his rule would lead to a
communist takeover. One story "went all over the world and back again", writes
Reddaway, while information from Gilchrist was "put almost instantly back into
Indonesia via the BBC".

This included an allegation, with no apparent basis in reality, that Indonesian
communists were planning to slaughter the citizens of Jakarta.

Reddaway, a specialist with the FO?s Information Research Department (IRD),
writes: "I wondered whether this was the first time in history that an
ambassador had been able to address the people of his country of work almost at
will and virtually instantaneously."

Showing his low opinion of journalists, he boasts that "newsmen would take
anything from here, and pestered us for copy". He had been sent to Singapore to
bolster British efforts to overthrow the Indonesian president and support
General Suharto. His brief from London had been "to do whatever I could do to
get rid of Sukarno", he revealed before his death last year. He therefore
embarked on an extensive campaign of placing favourable stories with news wires,
foreign correspondents and the BBC, and also used the pages of Encounter, an
influential magazine for the liberal intelligentsia which, it later emerged, had
been funded and controlled by the CIA.

His letter even suggests that the Observer newspaper had been persuaded to take
the Foreign Office "angle" on the Indonesian takeover by reporting a "kid glove
coup without butchery".

Last month, Abdurrahman Wahid, the country?s current president, gave his support
to a judicial inquiry into the massacres of 1965-66 and, in an interview
broadcast on state television, promised to punish those found guilty.

Newly discovered cabinet papers show that British agencies, including MI6, had
supported Islamic guerrillas and other dissident groups in an effort to
destabilise Sukarno. The disorder fostered by the British led to General Suharto?s
takeover and dictatorship, and a wave of violence unseen since the Second World
War. The massacre set the stage for almost 35 years of violent suppression,
including the 1975 invasion of East Timor, which was only reversed last year.

The cabinet documents (which are separate from the revelations of Reddaway) were
uncovered by David Easter, a historian at the London School of Economics. His
research ? which is published this week in the journal Intelligence and National
Security ? shows that the cabinet?s defence and overseas policy committee asked
the head of MI6, Dick White, to draw up plans for covert operations against
Indonesia in January 1964. According to Dr Easter, these operations began in the
spring of that year and included supplying arms to separatists in the Indonesian
provinces of Aceh and Sulawesi.

These actions were complemented by a propaganda campaign run out of Britain?s
Far East HQ in Singapore by the IRD, which had close connections with MI6. The
unit was behind stories that Sukarno and his tolerance of the Indonesian
Communist Party (PKI) would lead to a communist dictatorship in Indonesia.

Reddaway was a key part of this. His letter, written in July 1966, was released
to Churchill College, Cambridge, which holds the private papers of Sir Andrew
Gilchrist.

Last night, Lord Healey owned up to the Foreign Office misinformation campaign.

Lord Healey said: "Norman Reddaway had an office in Singapore. They began to put
out false information and I think that, to my horror on one occasion, they put
forged documents on the bodies of Indonesian soldiers we had taken. I confronted
Reddaway over this.

"The key thing here is that Indonesia was infiltrating its troops into Borneo
and had organised a coup against the Sultan of Brunei with whom we had a treaty.
So we reacted similarly. I think it has been long known that British Special
Forces ? the SAS, SBS and Gurkhas ? were used to tackle the Indonesians. But
everything was done on the ground. I would not let the RAF drop a single bomb
although they were very anxious to get involved."

Lord Healey denied any personal knowledge of the wider MI6 campaign to arm
opponents of Sukarno. But, he added: "I would certainly have supported it."

According to one of the country?s leading commentators on security matters ?
Richard Aldrich, a professor at Nottingham University ?the episode shows Britain?s
post-war operations at their most effective. "It represents one of the supreme
achievements of the British clandestine services," he said. "In contrast with
the American CIA, they remained politically accountable and low-key. Britain has
a preference for bribingpeople rather than blowing them up."

Tidak ada komentar:

Posting Komentar